Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How about the one-stage training strategy? #7

Open
TheSunWillRise opened this issue Mar 18, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

How about the one-stage training strategy? #7

TheSunWillRise opened this issue Mar 18, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@TheSunWillRise
Copy link

Hi, I note that all your models are trained by using two-stage training strategy, which trains models on a larger additional dataset for the first stage. However, in Table 1 from your paper, models you compared with are trained just on DAVIS-2016. THis is not fair for other models, so I wonder how about J mean and F mean of your models trained just on DAVIS-2016?

@seoungwugoh
Copy link
Owner

Please refer to Table. 5 in our paper for the result without the pre-training.

The DAVIS benchmark does not have a strictly rule on the use of additional training data.
Many previous methods (e.g. MaskTrack, perazzi et al.) adopt pre-training.

Thanks,
Seoung Wug

@TheSunWillRise
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your reply. Besides, would you please release your train codes?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants