Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accuracy without pre-training #12

Open
0316038 opened this issue Sep 21, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Accuracy without pre-training #12

0316038 opened this issue Sep 21, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@0316038
Copy link

0316038 commented Sep 21, 2019

Hi, I would like to ask about the ablation study without pre-training(-PT).
How many epoch did you train and how to set the learning rate for the fine-tuning part to get the accuracy in Table 5? (J mean is 68.6 and F mean is 68.9)
Thanks for your attention and hope to hear your reply soon.

@seoungwugoh
Copy link
Owner

Hi,
For the purpose of ablation study, we apply the same training schedule with the counter part (with pre-training).
Please refer to our paper for details.

@huhu5036
Copy link

Hi, Did you ever try to set the prior frame mask to all black? I would like to know how much the reference frame and mask matter? Thus, the method can really handle it well when the target appears again from disappeared.
Thanks a lot, and hope for your reply.

@seoungwugoh
Copy link
Owner

@huhu5036 We have the exact experiment in our paper (Fig.5 and Table.5). You can see the effect of the reference frame and the previous mask.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants