Replies: 5 comments 4 replies
-
Is it crashing at the very beginning? It seems that you start with a fully charged battery but the first step is charging. Could be related to that. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If I change the experiment and solution to:
Then it complains: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
it is odd, but
seems to work |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
another odd thing is that if I do:
I get ranges in the 2.5-3.65 V, instead of the expected 40-58.4V range (for V1.entries) I will start a new discussion thread for this line of questions |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Another odd thing, this doesnt seem to work for Mohtat2020. There I set similar conditions:
and
but it tells me: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am trying to simulate a system with 16 lfp batteries in series. I modified the Prada2013 file to reflect that:
"Number of electrodes connected in parallel to make a cell": 4.0,
"Number of cells connected in series to make a battery": 16.0,
"Lower voltage cut-off [V]": 2.5,
"Upper voltage cut-off [V]": 3.65,
"Initial concentration in negative electrode [mol.m-3]": 28831.45783,
"Initial concentration in positive electrode [mol.m-3]": 35.3766672,
"Initial temperature [K]": 298.15,
Then I set the ranges of my experiment:
exp = pybamm.Experiment(
[
(
"Charge at 1 C until 58.4 V",
"Hold at 58.4 V until C/10",
"Rest for 5 minutes",
"Discharge at 1 C until 40 V",
"Rest for 5 minutes",
)
]
)
But it is still complaining:
2022-12-14 15:16:49.165 - [ERROR] callbacks.on_experiment_error(226): Simulation error: Could not find consistent states: Could not find acceptable solution: .../casadi/core/linsol.cpp:173: Assertion "m->is_nfact" failed:
Are there any other parameters in Prada2013 that I need to modify?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions