You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The "get users" command displays the username, active, display_name, and email fields of the user object. This is missing the permissions fields (site_spectator, site_manager, site_admin, all booleans) and the meta field (which is just a string).
In particular, it would be nice if the permissions fields were condensed into one field for display, permissions, which could be a list of the permissions a user has. This is the same way that permissions are displayed for projects, as below:
(h for help) : gp
(Optional) (y/N) Allow revised?:
(Optional) (y/N) Allow deleted?:
(Optional) By project slug: test
slugs: test, test1
name: Test Project
users:
kennric <member, manager, spectator>
patcht <member, spectator>
The "get users" command displays the
username
,active
,display_name
, andemail
fields of the user object. This is missing the permissions fields (site_spectator
,site_manager
,site_admin
, all booleans) and themeta
field (which is just a string).In particular, it would be nice if the permissions fields were condensed into one field for display,
permissions
, which could be a list of the permissions a user has. This is the same way that permissions are displayed for projects, as below:So, we could display users as, e.g.:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: