You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As of now, there is already some profile support in place, which assumes different build scenarios (testing, release). However, in order to accommodate differences in various distributions in a usable way (rather that providing bunch of -C options each time), sets of configuration options for these should be bundled in some separate configuration files which then can be supplied to ddiskit in a way similar to the current profile setting. The open questions here:
Do we need more flexible support for additional configuration files rather than adding yet another profile?
How the priorities of these distribution profiles comparing to existing profiles should be set? As of now, all the options of interest are independent, but it might not always be the case. Should these priorities be configurable?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As of now, there is already some profile support in place, which assumes different build scenarios (testing, release). However, in order to accommodate differences in various distributions in a usable way (rather that providing bunch of -C options each time), sets of configuration options for these should be bundled in some separate configuration files which then can be supplied to ddiskit in a way similar to the current profile setting. The open questions here:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: