Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[BUG] Case with do-not-care #2681

Open
1 task done
likeamahoney opened this issue Dec 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

[BUG] Case with do-not-care #2681

likeamahoney opened this issue Dec 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
notCV32A65X It is not an CV32A65X issue Type:Bug For bugs in the RTL, Documentation, Verification environment or Tool and Build system

Comments

@likeamahoney
Copy link
Contributor

likeamahoney commented Dec 28, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Is there an existing CVA6 bug for this?

  • I have searched the existing bug issues

Bug Description

Hi all. Found a case with labels which use do-not-care values bits (as part of concatenation).

SystemVerilog LRM recommends to use do-not-care values only in casex/casez operators or case with inside operator or do-not-care values may work not as it is expected.
@likeamahoney likeamahoney added the Type:Bug For bugs in the RTL, Documentation, Verification environment or Tool and Build system label Dec 28, 2024
@JeanRochCoulon JeanRochCoulon added the notCV32A65X It is not an CV32A65X issue label Jan 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
notCV32A65X It is not an CV32A65X issue Type:Bug For bugs in the RTL, Documentation, Verification environment or Tool and Build system
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@JeanRochCoulon @likeamahoney