[BUG] Privilege level are not covered

[likeamahoney]

Is there an existing CVA6 bug for this?

• I have searched the existing bug issues

Bug Description

Hi, all!

There is a case operator without default statement and which not covers the PRIV_LVL_HS level which specified in riscv package.

There is also an another riscv package which specifies only 3 existing possible levels here but type of selector used in case are from the first one.

Could this be a typo or was it done on purpose?

[JeanRochCoulon]

Thanks @likeamahoney.
My first feedback on the first issue is that the code belongs to the instruction trace, which is not synthetized and maybe not used by most of the users (it has been replaced by RVFI tracer).
Concerning the second issue, this verilog file is not included in Flist.cva6, so it is not used. @Moschn do you think it would be worth cleaning by removing it ?