Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does taxslim contain a class entry for every NCBITaxon purl? #121

Open
ddooley opened this issue Jan 24, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

Does taxslim contain a class entry for every NCBITaxon purl? #121

ddooley opened this issue Jan 24, 2025 · 4 comments

Comments

@ddooley
Copy link

ddooley commented Jan 24, 2025

It isn't quite clear to me the taxonslim subset has every NCBITaxon taxon class term id in it, or whether the following exclude lots of NCBITaxon taxon class term ids? According to README.md it includes:

  • Anything used in a taxon constraint in an ontology
  • All UniProt Reference Proteomes
  • Any taxon that has a non-IEA annotation in GO

I'm looking for a small but complete taxon slim file to use via ODK to import about 4,000 taxa. Wanting a say 7 or 10mb file to give ODK as import source; not wanting a 500mb or 1.5 gig file.

@matentzn
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @ddooley many ontologies use the NCBITaxon taxslim now and everyone is welcome to add terms. We keep adding new ones.

The documentation you cite is a bit old. The list of included taxon ids is specified in here: https://github.com/obophenotype/ncbitaxon/blob/master/subsets/taxon-subset-ids.txt

If you need classes added, you just make a PR and we will add them in the next release!

@ddooley
Copy link
Author

ddooley commented Jan 24, 2025

I see the question of whether it contains all NCBITaxon ids is answered by the need to add some manually. Thx. I'll see if it contains the 4,000+ we need.

@ddooley ddooley closed this as completed Jan 24, 2025
@ddooley
Copy link
Author

ddooley commented Jan 25, 2025

So we'd have to add over 3,600 new terms to make use of this slim for ODK purposes. Is that ok?

@matentzn
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, its ok!

@ddooley ddooley reopened this Jan 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants