You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently this project is an @nrwl/nx-plugin created with v10. In v11, Nx changed a few things in the structure, mainly around naming schematics -> generators, builders -> executors, architects => targets, and possibly some more.
The generators, besides to having a new name, also have a new way to write them. The commands that run in the generator can now be simply await-ed which makes it (especially with a project like this) easier to write, debug and share them. Those that have worked with schematics probably feel why. In some ways schematics might be easier, but we can wrap around those.
A question comes to my mind here. The nxpm/cli creates a workspace without versions pinned and the repo uses v10 and nx-plugin 10. Right now the cli creates a Nx 11 workspace with the Nx 10 plugin which could lead into problems
Expected Behavior
@nxpm/stack
should be built using Nx 11.Current Behavior
@nxpm/stack
is built using Nx 10.Context
Currently this project is an
@nrwl/nx-plugin
created with v10. In v11, Nx changed a few things in the structure, mainly around namingschematics
->generators
,builders
->executors
,architects
=>targets
, and possibly some more.The generators, besides to having a new name, also have a new way to write them. The commands that run in the generator can now be simply
await
-ed which makes it (especially with a project like this) easier to write, debug and share them. Those that have worked with schematics probably feel why. In some ways schematics might be easier, but we can wrap around those.The new version also allows for some structural changes, and will be split up into several packages.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: