Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should -fexceptions / -frtti be part of @nanobind's copts? #54

Open
nicholasjng opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Should -fexceptions / -frtti be part of @nanobind's copts? #54

nicholasjng opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@nicholasjng
Copy link
Owner

nicholasjng commented Jan 6, 2025

wjakob/nanobind@698f449 says that nanobind cannot work properly without RTTI and exceptions.

Even though I request neither of these explicitly in my nanobind copts, everything seems to work as expected. Or does it? The nanobind_example and google/benchmark are green, but I'm wondering if I need to be more thorough in my copts here.

@nicholasjng nicholasjng added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant