You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
nanobind supports PyPy bindings builds, and so should nanobind-bazel.
Currently, the CPython header dep is hardcoded, but building with PyPy instead should work similarly.
To the best of my knowledge, rules_python has no PyPy support, so users are (currently) on their own when supplying the headers. It's possible today to monkey-patch the Python building the wheel with a Bazel toolchain declaration, which could be a way forward here.
Needs investigation on my part into how to build C++ extensions for PyPy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
nanobind supports PyPy bindings builds, and so should nanobind-bazel.
Currently, the CPython header dep is hardcoded, but building with PyPy instead should work similarly.
To the best of my knowledge, rules_python has no PyPy support, so users are (currently) on their own when supplying the headers. It's possible today to monkey-patch the Python building the wheel with a Bazel toolchain declaration, which could be a way forward here.
Needs investigation on my part into how to build C++ extensions for PyPy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: