Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correctly trigger incorrect number of formulas error #249

Open
mhunter1 opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Correctly trigger incorrect number of formulas error #249

mhunter1 opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
better errors Make better error and/or warning messages good first issue Good for newcomers minor task

Comments

@mhunter1
Copy link
Owner

This code is supposed to trigger an error about the number of formulas, but doesn't.

@mhunter1 mhunter1 added good first issue Good for newcomers minor task better errors Make better error and/or warning messages labels Apr 24, 2020
@mhunter1 mhunter1 added this to the Coding Session 1 milestone Apr 24, 2020
@mhunter1 mhunter1 self-assigned this Jun 1, 2020
@mhunter1
Copy link
Owner Author

mhunter1 commented Jun 1, 2020

@meng-chen-2013 said

One quick question, does dynr not allow regimes to have models of different order (like a AR(1) for regime 1 and AR(2) for regime 2)? It seems like all the regime checks require the same latent states in identical order. Or is this something that the user needs to maneuver and trick the algorithm for?

That's a good point! I think I need to relax my check.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
better errors Make better error and/or warning messages good first issue Good for newcomers minor task
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants