You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a couple of concerns regarding your implementation:
Variation with Particle Index: In your code, P_mean varies with the particle index i, which seems unusual. Could you clarify the reasoning behind this approach?
Addition of P(:,:,i): Additionally, I am curious why (xl_mean - xl(:,i)) * (xl_mean - xl(:,i))' adds P(:,:,i). This appears to differ from the typical formulation used in particle filters.
Dear Professor Manon Kok,
I am a student from Zhejiang University, and I have some questions regarding the following code in parcileFilter.m:
Here, P represents the state covariance of the 515 coefficients of the basis functions, which are regarded as linear states within the filter.
In typical particle filters, P_mean is usually calculated as follows:
I have a couple of concerns regarding your implementation:
Variation with Particle Index: In your code, P_mean varies with the particle index i, which seems unusual. Could you clarify the reasoning behind this approach?
Addition of P(:,:,i): Additionally, I am curious why (xl_mean - xl(:,i)) * (xl_mean - xl(:,i))' adds P(:,:,i). This appears to differ from the typical formulation used in particle filters.
Thank you for your time and assistance.
Best regards,
Bingbing
[email protected]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: