You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For integration with various CI pipeline tools with JUnit format support, it would be nice to have JUnit output from check directly instead of relying on external converters such as check2junit.py. It seems from the mailinglist archives that Glenn Washburn did a patch for this back in the days
and that it was positively received bu the maintainers. Apparently, a larger refactorization was done around that time; was that JUnit patch then never updated to match the new codebase and forgotten?
I did some experiments with applying it to the contemporary codebase, but there is a bit more than simple fixes needed to make things roll with the current codebase design. (And then some better knowledge of check and JUnit than mine is needed.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
was that JUnit patch then never updated to match the new codebase and forgotten?
My understanding from reading through the conversation is that the patches stalled out when asking for adding documentation to go along with adding support for JUnit XML output.
The Check project would be up for reviewing this feature again, if a volunteer from the community would be available to adapt the patches and create a pull request in GitHub.
For integration with various CI pipeline tools with JUnit format support, it would be nice to have JUnit output from
check
directly instead of relying on external converters such as check2junit.py. It seems from the mailinglist archives that Glenn Washburn did a patch for this back in the dayshttps://sourceforge.net/p/check/mailman/message/2963561/
and that it was positively received bu the maintainers. Apparently, a larger refactorization was done around that time; was that JUnit patch then never updated to match the new codebase and forgotten?
I did some experiments with applying it to the contemporary codebase, but there is a bit more than simple fixes needed to make things roll with the current codebase design. (And then some better knowledge of
check
and JUnit than mine is needed.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: