Gregsdennis/external links #1568
Draft
+89
−240
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jdesrosiers
reviewed
Jan 6, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reference style links might be a good choice for this. Especially if we end up making the same reference in multiple places.
## Blah
Blah, blah, [JSON Pointer][RFC6901], blah.
### Again
Some other reference to [JSON Poiner][RFC6901] elsewhere in the spec.
<!-- Reference links can go in one place at the bottom -->
[RFC6901]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6901
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
editorial
Issue & Discussion References
Summary
Inline all of the links to external documents and remove the associated appendix.
-[ ] Still a couple open comments on the issue to address
-[ ] need to perform markdown cleanup
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No