Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"this method consumes significantly less memory and works faster" #7

Open
FredM67 opened this issue Jan 23, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@FredM67
Copy link

FredM67 commented Jan 23, 2024

Well, the first is true but the second is false.
I've tested it, it's way slower than an optimized sliding average with one or more array.

On a reasonable amount of data, this method is around twice slower than what I've implemented !

@nomakewan
Copy link

Considering you have opened an issue, perhaps you could show your implementation so that it can be compared against this library's implementation?

In addition, since it is now clear this library was tested on an ESP8266, is it possible that on an ESP8266 this statement is in fact true, even though on an AVR it may not be?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants