LPPL-1.3c license specificities #214
-
|
Hello everyone! Because novathesis is licensed under the LPPL-1.3c, does that mean that I am required to publicly disclose the source code I used to make my thesis? Thanks a bunch and thank you all for the great work! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
tl:dr; No. When the licence means Work is source code. WORK is not the "use" of the WORK. Also LPPL-1.3c is not GPL.
For the rationale: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@GilOliveira don't forget to mark this as "Answered". Thank you. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
tl:dr; No. When the licence means Work is source code. WORK is not the "use" of the WORK.
Also LPPL-1.3c is not GPL.
For the rationale:
LPPL 1.3c: What is a "compiled work"? where someone in the answers pointed to this GPL-Licensed LaTeX template - implications for resulting work?. Thus, finally Is a PDF output from a LaTeX document, a "derived work" from the LPPL standard packages? [closed] where "The answer is clearly and unambiguously NO". If you're still not sure, see the second answer from this last link, especially the replies.