Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Identify dysfunctional signaling by using differential expression analysis #295

Open
tumorscholar opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@tumorscholar
Copy link

Hello Jin,
Thank you very much for creating this nice tool.
I have used the below-written script and generated net file for the interaction pair.

#Identify dysfunctional signaling by using differential expression analysis
#define a positive dataset, i.e., the dataset with positive fold change against the other dataset
pos.dataset = "Fibrosis"
# define a char name used for storing the results of differential expression analysis
features.name = paste0(pos.dataset, ".merged")

cellchat <- identifyOverExpressedGenes(cellchat, group.dataset = "datasets", pos.dataset = pos.dataset, features.name = features.name, only.pos = FALSE, thresh.pc = 0.1, thresh.fc = 0.05,thresh.p = 0.05, group.DE.combined = FALSE) 

# map the results of differential expression analysis onto the inferred cell-cell communications to easily manage/subset the ligand-receptor pairs of interest
net <- netMappingDEG(cellchat, features.name = features.name, variable.all = TRUE)
write.csv(net, "/data/home/hdx044/files/cellchat/LIVER/InteractionInLIVERfibrosis.csv")

Some interaction pairs like MIF-associated MIF - (CD74+CXCR4) or MIF - (CD74+CD44) miss the value associated with the MIF ligand.

image

Could you please give the possible reasons for this?

Thank you
Regards,
Raju

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant