-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make a package out of download_zenodo() and publish it under rOpenSci #71
Comments
I would be all for that. We could even reach out to rOpenSci to see if we can take over pkg maintenance. |
I fully agree. Would love not to have to depend on I believe complexity is an unavoidable downside of collecting various different functions in one package ( |
I ran a search and found zen4R to be interesting as well. Both zen4R and zenodo provide functionalities that interact with the Zenodo REST API. The function |
It seems that I think we should reach out to the developers of both packages and to rOpenSci to initiate that discussion (could be done from and in this thread). |
The function is now (also) part of the |
Just note that both functions are fundamentally different. If I remember correctly the |
The function
download_zenodo()
seems something very interesting and it can have a very broad audience.While following the discussion in #69, I am happy to see that this function is getting more and more complete but also complex (= more dependencies).
Broad scope + completeness + complexity = package 📦
Especially if I see that there is a package called
zenodo
to upload data to zenodo and whose documentation is published under the hood of rOpenSci. However the package is quite old, probably not actively maintained anymore and that it is not listed among the rOpenSci packages.@inbo/bmk , @inbo/oscibio: what do you think about it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: