Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improvements to flow when logging in to edit #22

Open
ghwood opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

improvements to flow when logging in to edit #22

ghwood opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@ghwood
Copy link

ghwood commented Oct 18, 2022

Currently, when a not-logged-in-to-Datatracker visitor is on an arbitrary IETF wiki page (e.g. https://wiki.ietf.org/group/emodir), and uses the Edit button to begin editing, they are directed to a page indicating they are Unauthorized with a link to "login as".

When they press that link, they are prompted to log in via Datatracker and after completing that, returned to the "main" wiki page (in this example, https://wiki.ietf.org/).

Two things would make this friendlier:

a) providing some indication in the Unauthorized page that they will be using IETF Datatracker credentials when continuing via "Login as..", and

b) after completing the login process, returning the user to the page from which the edit request was made.

@justinacolmena
Copy link

justinacolmena commented Dec 13, 2022

Somewhere between Sam Brinton, Sheriff Lamb, the DoD, the NSA, and a large number of recently fired CIA and FBI agents, there's an authentication issue or something with "IETF Datatracker credentials" -- if that's the authentication mechanism in use, then that's what's being used. And why the fork of the whole wiki.js project? But anyways, on to 3.0 if that is the plan.

Yes. I agree with point (b) but point (a) is merely a minor custom site modification.

I hate to change the subject, maybe it is on topic with authentication, but I half suspect there's a military shop doing fact-checking online and running a "Q Drop" to purge "misinformation" from private databases and pages are disappearing. That's a "DELETE FROM" not a "DROP TABLE" though, w.r.t. PostgreSQL, it is reputedly very stable solid and reliable, but beware people who "have been in business too long" and there is old code that isn't up to snuff in all modern situations especially if you are doing something other people do not want you to do, and certainly on a wiki, where it is tempting for others to attempt a defacement when they do not have the necessary permissions or authorization.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants