Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

An in-range update of lolex is breaking the build 🚨 #297

Open
greenkeeper bot opened this issue May 8, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

An in-range update of lolex is breaking the build 🚨 #297

greenkeeper bot opened this issue May 8, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@greenkeeper
Copy link

greenkeeper bot commented May 8, 2018

Version 2.4.0 of lolex was just published.

Branch Build failing 🚨
Dependency lolex
Current Version 2.3.2
Type devDependency

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

lolex is a devDependency of this project. It might not break your production code or affect downstream projects, but probably breaks your build or test tools, which may prevent deploying or publishing.

Status Details
  • coverage/coveralls Coverage pending from Coveralls.io Details
  • continuous-integration/travis-ci/push The Travis CI build failed Details

Commits

The new version differs by 14 commits.

  • 60b7228 2.4.0
  • 4444d1d Prepare for new release
  • da5505b Merge branch 'SimenB-factory' (PR #164)
  • b192b79 Add withGlobal export
  • 0645e34 wrap the whole source inside a factory function
  • 63b1929 Remove bithound
  • 9cc3fb9 Update all deps except Mochify
  • e745324 Merge branch 'CoderK-develop' from PR-160
  • 469b547 Fix that performance.mark is undefined after timer install
  • 919bb00 Add regression test for #136
  • d8c978f Merge pull request #156 from Peer5/expose-run-microtasks
  • 8bb870e Update lolex-src.js
  • 3805ef1 docs
  • dade130 expose runMicrotasks

See the full diff

FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don’t help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented May 8, 2018

After pinning to 2.3.2 your tests are still failing. The reported issue might not affect your project. These imprecisions are caused by inconsistent test results.

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented May 8, 2018

Version 2.4.1 just got published.

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare the changes 🚨

Commits

The new version differs by 3 commits.

See the full diff

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented May 13, 2018

Version 2.5.0 just got published.

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare the changes 🚨

Commits

The new version differs by 16 commits.

  • 8f5bcb4 2.5.0
  • 36f5fad Prepare for new release
  • d0f159b Merge pull request #174 from Alexsey/typos
  • 3db1e3d Merge pull request #176 from SimenB/patch-1
  • 1b23595 chore: use prepublishOnly instead of prepublish
  • 36d7c01 feat: respect loopLimit in runMicrotasks (#172)
  • 0385e50 Update Node.js versions
  • 1bf1d09 Merge pull request #169 from SimenB/integration-jsdom
  • 0ea982c fix: typos in github templates
  • 8ec6170 assign performance as a property, not as a function
  • efaf88e add simple integration test with jsdom
  • 5985809 Add issue and pull request templates
  • 7fed784 2.4.2
  • b7aa881 Prepare for new release
  • 0c0ec83 Upgrade Mochify to v5.6 (#162)

There are 16 commits in total.

See the full diff

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented May 16, 2018

Version 2.6.0 just got published.

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare the changes 🚨

Commits

The new version differs by 6 commits.

  • 92815e3 2.6.0
  • f07009b Prepare for new release
  • 7fc5c11 Merge pull request #179 from SimenB/reset
  • a1bf36c Clear microtick jobs and set now to 0 in reset
  • 8fb9173 Merge pull request #178 from SimenB/date-instanceof
  • 2bb03d6 Access Date on _global

See the full diff

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants