You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Is there a way to get CM5 charges instead of Mulliken charges from xtb-ase interface? Any help would be highly appreciated.
Describe the solution you'd like
I have used the command line executable to generate CM5 charges, but it would be great to include that in python API.
Additional context
I have published on CM5 charges and their utility for modeling organic drug-like molecules. See the link below. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00414
Adding this feature would help seamlessly integrate XTB with force fields such as OpenFF
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Implementing the CM5 correction is rather straight-forward (see grimme-lab/multicharge#7). Not sure what the best option is to make them available in the API, though.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Is there a way to get CM5 charges instead of Mulliken charges from xtb-ase interface? Any help would be highly appreciated.
Describe the solution you'd like
I have used the command line executable to generate CM5 charges, but it would be great to include that in python API.
Additional context
I have published on CM5 charges and their utility for modeling organic drug-like molecules. See the link below.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00414
Adding this feature would help seamlessly integrate XTB with force fields such as OpenFF
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: