-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for arbitrary real-value point weights #32
Comments
I only use integer and half-integer point values myself, so the current system serves as a sort of sanity check...if a point value doesn't fit those criteria, then it's a typo. I'm open to broadening the allowed values, for example, maybe allow quarter integers everywhere. Are there use cases where point values really need to be arbitrary floats specified to the hundreds place or beyond? |
Hi @gpoore, Frequently enough, though perhaps this might be attributed to poor planning administration on my part! E.g., when the an exam is worth 40 points, and for the time available (or given the topics we have managed to cover) we are going to only have 25 or 30 questions. I know there are hacks where can assign one point per question and then reweight the entire exam ... but it is more straightforward to assign To maintain the sanity check functionality, maybe it can be the default but with a flag (e.g., "--real-valued-points") to relax the check. Or vice versa, force the reality check which off by default by a flag? |
I am fine with integer valued points but it would help to be able to include "0" points as an option, because for practice quizzes it is it more clear to the students that it is ungraded if the points are 0. Perhaps there could be a command-line option like |
Hi all - agree with JeffFessler; zero points are frequently useful. For example, if you want them to upload a "back-up" file or something that may not actually get graded. |
If anyone (like @jlgraves-ubc) wants to just do this for themselves, simply change line 218 in I made this change to my local copy and reran the setup |
Update: it is a good thing I left the above note for myself because sure enough I am back here trying to remember how to allow 0 point answers. Line 228 in de0c805
Still wishing it were a command-line option instead having to hack the code for every update. |
Same here - zero point value questions would be useful for questions like "Do you agree to the honor code?". Or optional survey questions that don't need to be answered. |
For both individual questions as well as group questions, Canvas supports arbitrary real-valued point weights (e.g., 1.63).
Could this be added to text2qti? Currently individual questions now only support integer and half-integer (e.g. 1.5), while grouped questions only support integers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: