github sites #5
Comments
|
My dear friend i currently stopped supporting this library because of
issues like that. The engine behind JavaFX WebBrowser is badly outdated. It
can't even play full hd youtube videos.
I think it has to do eith some background parsing....
:)
…On Sun, Aug 5, 2018, 20:50 manny kung ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi @goxr3plus <https://github.com/goxr3plus>,
Have you investigated why github sites won't work ?
e.g. if I type in https://github.com/goxr3plus/JavaFX-Web-Browser, it
won't render correctly.
I'm using Java 9/10 64-bit in Windows
It almost looks like a crypto issue.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5>, or mute the
thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATbiwCUUlOmkzFag-PTRt_vm0FH7yn6yks5uNzBJgaJpZM4VveHR>
.
|
|
I am working on another Browser right now based on Chromium engine.
Google seaech JxBrowser Java. I am building a JavaFX Browser on top of it.
OpenSource :)
…On Sun, Aug 5, 2018, 22:04 GoXR3Plus Studio ***@***.***> wrote:
My dear friend i currently stopped supporting this library because of
issues like that. The engine behind JavaFX WebBrowser is badly outdated. It
can't even play full hd youtube videos.
I think it has to do eith some background parsing....
:)
On Sun, Aug 5, 2018, 20:50 manny kung ***@***.***> wrote:
> Hi @goxr3plus <https://github.com/goxr3plus>,
>
> Have you investigated why github sites won't work ?
>
> e.g. if I type in https://github.com/goxr3plus/JavaFX-Web-Browser, it
> won't render correctly.
>
> I'm using Java 9/10 64-bit in Windows
>
> It almost looks like a crypto issue.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#5>, or mute the
> thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATbiwCUUlOmkzFag-PTRt_vm0FH7yn6yks5uNzBJgaJpZM4VveHR>
> .
>
|
|
is JxBrowser fully open source ? how frequent do they update the chromium engine ? |
|
JavaFX's webengine is based on webkit, you know. Webkit is not that bad. It's just that JavaFX development has been very slow and they use older version of webkit and is forever playing catchup :( I'm glad that beginning Java 11, the JavaFX portion will be handed to developers. |
|
Yes my friend it's amazing news with Java 11, i may start heavily updating
this web browser again. Until then JxBrowser is the solution at least for
me. It's almost exactly like Google Chrome, except the mp4 decodes etc
which you need to get a license too....
Check it here
https://www.teamdev.com/jxbrowser
Have also a look on XR3Player using it :
https://github.com/goxr3plus/XR3Player
…On Mon, Aug 6, 2018, 04:07 manny kung ***@***.***> wrote:
JavaFX's webengine is based on webkit, you know. Webkit is not that bad.
It's just that JavaFX development has been very slow and they use older
version of webkit and is forever playing catchup :(
I'm glad that beginning Java 11, the JavaFX portion will be handed to
developers.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATbiwDiHEIAIglx_YRBF-gWrHOmg3R1Bks5uN5a-gaJpZM4VveHR>
.
|
|
But why are they charging license fee ? https://www.teamdev.com/jxbrowser#licensing-pricing
Also, do they use webkit for video ?
|
|
they just if you want to use it commercially, you know they have to survive
as a company.
Really i didn't knew they used WebKit.....
…On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 00:08 manny kung ***@***.***> wrote:
But why are they charging license fee ?
https://www.teamdev.com/jxbrowser#licensing-pricing
Evaluation Support
Provided for 30 days
Also, do they use webkit for video ?
JxBrowser is using Webkit and FFmpeg components, supplied under LGPL.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATbiwL78ttSru1qT5VmJqFaVFhuJNvWZks5uOLBCgaJpZM4VveHR>
.
|
|
Have a look at this StackOverflow question :
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5850338/rendering-webpages-with-webkit-in-java
I hope now that JavaFX after separation from standart Java SDK becomes more
powerful and frequntly updated.
:)
…On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 01:10 GoXR3Plus Studio ***@***.***> wrote:
they just if you want to use it commercially, you know they have to
survive as a company.
Really i didn't knew they used WebKit.....
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 00:08 manny kung ***@***.***> wrote:
> But why are they charging license fee ?
>
> https://www.teamdev.com/jxbrowser#licensing-pricing
>
> Evaluation Support
> Provided for 30 days
>
> Also, do they use webkit for video ?
>
> JxBrowser is using Webkit and FFmpeg components, supplied under LGPL.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#5 (comment)>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATbiwL78ttSru1qT5VmJqFaVFhuJNvWZks5uOLBCgaJpZM4VveHR>
> .
>
|
|
We can use
to see what version of webkit the java jdk that we are using. |
|
For JDK 8u131, it prints the following :
For JDK 10.0.2,
|
|
I found this page : It's almost same tag info given by or in here : 605.1 is used by Safari 11.1 |
|
Awww now i catched it, thank you!!! :)
…On Wed, Aug 8, 2018, 01:19 manny kung ***@***.***> wrote:
I found this page :
https://developers.whatismybrowser.com/useragents/explore/software_name/safari/?order_by=software_version
It's the same tag given by engine.getUserAgent()
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATbiwLxgZdxYMqqD4__x1Qu_o_pdrS-pks5uOhJWgaJpZM4VveHR>
.
|
|
Hello my friend , what should i do with this issue ? Soon i will pass this project on Java 11. |
|
@mokun Okay now i have the knowledge to pass this project on Java 11 . |
Hi @goxr3plus,
Have you investigated why github sites won't work ?
e.g. if I type in
https://github.com/goxr3plus/JavaFX-Web-Browser, it won't render correctly.I'm using Java 9/10 64-bit in Windows
It almost looks like a crypto issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: