Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GlyGen Metadata upload #77

Closed
ReneRanzinger opened this issue Aug 4, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

GlyGen Metadata upload #77

ReneRanzinger opened this issue Aug 4, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ReneRanzinger
Copy link
Contributor

ReneRanzinger commented Aug 4, 2024

As discussed in our meeting with @Mindyporterfield we should have an easy way to add GlyGen metadata to a collection.

  1. Add a button "Add GlyGen metadata" button left of the add metadata button in edit collection (above the metadata table).
  2. That button brings you to the "second" page of the metadata wizard with all the GlyGen metadata shown by default with their corresponding input fields. Metadata that has a multiple attribute have a "+" icon on the right that allows to add one more "row" of the same metadata. Non-mandatory rows or additional rows (even for mandatory rows) have a trash bin icon to delete the row.

In the following listing mandatory rows a in bold:

  • Evidence
  • Species
  • Strain
  • Tissue
  • Cell line ID
  • Disease
  • Glycan dictionary term ID
  • has_abundance
  • has_expression
  • Functional annotation/Keyword
  • Variant (Fly, yeast, mouse)
  • Organismal/cellular Phenotype
  • Molecular Phenotype
  • Contributor
  • Comment
  • Experimental technique

Please note: This listing makes assumptions:

  • we only take biological data. Therefore species is required. If we allow to upload synthetic glycans that would have to be revised.
  • we only take data resulting from experiments. If we allow to upload theoretical glycans that would have to be revised.
  • we do allow upload of unpublished data. Therefore Evidence (PMID or DOID) is not required.
@ReneRanzinger
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jeet-vora will review the second part and confirm or suggest changes as part of #78

@senaarpinar
Copy link
Contributor

implemented with the current mandatory selections.

@jeet-vora
Copy link

I have few comments that we can discuss in today's meeting.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants