You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've added in a retreat scenario with Schoof's bed. We can see the retreat slow going up the sill, and then accelerate after moving past it. Weaker perturbations lead to a steady state on top of the sill. Regardless of the scenario, if I run it without coupling and the same initial steady state N (kept static), the uncoupled model halts retreat right away.
It's quite interesting how both C and As play a role in changing the relationship. C has a big role in changing the order of magnitude of tau, but the general shape of how tau depends on N and u seem to rely on both As and C. These shapes also differ from the nondimensionalized "tau" that I had plotted earlier, so it might make more sense to stick to these dimensional tau plots to think about.
Originally posted by @glugeorge in #3 (comment)
Using the min/max of u and N, we plot different relationships between a non-dimensionalized tau and N. Based off this profile:
Here is the tau vs u plot:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: