Shared-memory vs multi-process #176
Unanswered
AntoineC44
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments
-
@AntoineC44: Hi, yup this has been done internally in a read-only fashion. It is not a common use-case though (only one user uses it this way). The way it is done is to spin up a master process that first populates the cache and then the child processes will perform read-only operations. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Hello @therealgymmy, thanks for the answer, yes this use case is probably less frequent. So the lib would not support concurrent read/write on the cache over several processes? Only write once from a master process then read from other processes? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello,
I spent some time reading both docs and source code, it seems it may work sharing a cache created by this lib over several processes (as opposed to the suggested default being to create and exploit it in a multi-threaded process). Does someone know if this is indeed possible?
Thanks,
Antoine
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions