You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently relations only support tuple structs, named field structs would be good for documentation purposes.
I would certainly think it would be useful to use the input structs in non-crepe code, as it could be clearer than anonymous tuples.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for the suggestion. This is possible but also would require quite a few substantial changes to how the compiled code is generated, in particular the index data structure would need to be updated, and more parsing logic for relations introduced.
Currently relations only support tuple structs, named field structs would be good for documentation purposes.
I would certainly think it would be useful to use the input structs in non-crepe code, as it could be clearer than anonymous tuples.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: