Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 19, 2019. It is now read-only.

Add AMOLF eprints #11

Open
episanty opened this issue Aug 8, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Add AMOLF eprints #11

episanty opened this issue Aug 8, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@episanty
Copy link

episanty commented Aug 8, 2016

AMOLF has an eprint repository which I think is currently not being indexed. As an example, this paper is available as an eprint,

https://amolf.nl/publications/a-new-cathodoluminescence-system-for-nanoscale-optics-materials-science-and-geology

but http://doai.io/10.1017/S1551929516000377 currently sends to the Cambridge paywall. This does require a way of telling whether the repo actually has an eprint, though.

If this isn't the place to report where this should go, then the doai.io page should indicate what to do in such cases.

@wetneb
Copy link
Member

wetneb commented Aug 8, 2016

Thank you very much for the report! This is a perfect place for that. We
are working on a new version that might solve your problem.

On 08/08/2016 21:18, E Pisanty wrote:

AMOLF has an eprint repository which I think is currently not being
indexed. As an example, this paper is available as an eprint,

https://amolf.nl/publications/mid-infrared-strong-field-ionization-angular-distributions

but http://doai.io/10.1134/s1054660x09150079 currently sends to the
Springer home. If this isn't the place to report where this should go,
then the doai.io page should indicate what to do in such cases.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#11, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAS6lOc8tKt_dIr5AlRjAdWw0kv2kM0kks5qd4DzgaJpZM4JfYD6.

@episanty
Copy link
Author

episanty commented Aug 8, 2016

It's not really "my" problem, to be honest - it has not stopped me or even slowed me in finding copies of any papers I need. I posted it here because I think doai is a cool project and I think this sort of feedback (and being explicitly open to such feedback, such as having a direct link from the homepage) will make it stronger. I look forward to the new version.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants