You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 19, 2019. It is now read-only.
but http://doai.io/10.1017/S1551929516000377 currently sends to the Cambridge paywall. This does require a way of telling whether the repo actually has an eprint, though.
If this isn't the place to report where this should go, then the doai.io page should indicate what to do in such cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
but http://doai.io/10.1134/s1054660x09150079 currently sends to the
Springer home. If this isn't the place to report where this should go,
then the doai.io page should indicate what to do in such cases.
It's not really "my" problem, to be honest - it has not stopped me or even slowed me in finding copies of any papers I need. I posted it here because I think doai is a cool project and I think this sort of feedback (and being explicitly open to such feedback, such as having a direct link from the homepage) will make it stronger. I look forward to the new version.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
AMOLF has an eprint repository which I think is currently not being indexed. As an example, this paper is available as an eprint,
https://amolf.nl/publications/a-new-cathodoluminescence-system-for-nanoscale-optics-materials-science-and-geology
but http://doai.io/10.1017/S1551929516000377 currently sends to the Cambridge paywall. This does require a way of telling whether the repo actually has an eprint, though.
If this isn't the place to report where this should go, then the doai.io page should indicate what to do in such cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: