-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Publish registry operator to OpenShift OperatorHub #1301
Comments
Opened PR redhat-openshift-ecosystem/community-operators-prod#3615 to publish a bundle release of the registry operator to OpenShift OperatorHub catalog. Currently there are a few job failures differing from k8s-operatorhub/community-operators#3287 OperatorHub.io publication. To fix these, I need to perform the following:
Update: all failing jobs were fixed by suggestion from redhat-openshift-ecosystem/community-operators-prod#3615 (comment)) |
Update: None of these are necessary, adding |
Additional release process step to add |
redhat-openshift-ecosystem/community-operators-prod#3615 has been merged and bundle is now available under the community catalog. A few UI issues remain for the entry:
OperatorHub.io OpenShift 4.13 OperatorHub catalog We need to investigate and fix these before closing out this issue. |
Opened an issue to track the fix for #1301 (comment): #1354 #1354 will need to be resolved before the demo for these changes can be done. |
#1354 has been resolved and this issue is unblocked: #1354 (comment) Producing video demo to complete this issue. |
Video demo is completed and this item is now complete. |
Which area/kind this issue is related to?
/kind task
/area registry
/area releng
Issue Description
As with OperatorHub.io (#1211), we would like to make the devfile registry operator available under the OpenShift OperatorHub community catalog. Since the operator is published under OperatorHub.io already, we can use the same bundle for this publication.
Related discussion: #410 (comment)
Acceptance Criteria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: