Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dynamic Project Minimum Quorum #44

Open
jac18281828 opened this issue Dec 14, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Dynamic Project Minimum Quorum #44

jac18281828 opened this issue Dec 14, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@jac18281828
Copy link
Contributor

jac18281828 commented Dec 14, 2022

Dynamic quorum is likely not a requirement for any single vote, however token projects will have varying numbers of tokens and therefore a type of dynamic minimum quorum is probably required at the project and community level

  • Currently supporting fixed quorum: the quorum is settable on every proposal. Dynamic quorum is a feature addition
  • Dynamic quorum for the project would be based on the token contract implementing ERC721Enumerable and therefore optional and not always present.
  • Consider having fixed quorum for each vote but the minimum project quorum being calculated dynamically if the token is based on ERC721Enumerable -- specifically totalSupply is required
  • For strictly ERC-721 tokens, an alternative path can be provided for the project owner to “increase only” minimum quorum for the contract.
@jac18281828 jac18281828 added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Dec 14, 2022
@jac18281828 jac18281828 changed the title Dynamic Quorum Dynamic Project Minimum Quorum Dec 14, 2022
@jac18281828
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rocketman-21
Copy link

I think having a quorum set to a percentage of the total token base is necessary.

when I refer to dynamic quorum I mainly mean something like this based on percentage of against votes.

for now the former is definitely enough imo

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants