From ed34242ad8a132fbfaf50320dce288f5f831eb09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: liveactionllama | C4 <98446738+liveactionllama@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:59:49 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Clarification in FAQs

---
 structure/frequently-asked-questions.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/structure/frequently-asked-questions.md b/structure/frequently-asked-questions.md
index fd11965..280257c 100644
--- a/structure/frequently-asked-questions.md
+++ b/structure/frequently-asked-questions.md
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ Explaining and rationalizing the potential impact is an essential part of a qual
 
 ### Do Judges have the final say?
 
-They do. Judges review findings and sponsor input, and come to their own independent conclusion in alignment with our criteria. Doing this ensures the impartiality of the process. You can read more about our approach to this [here](https://docs.code4rena.com/awarding/judging-criteria).
+While sponsor input is a significant criterion, ultimately judges have final say in determining validity and severity of issues, as well as whether/how issues are considered duplicates. If you have fact-based evidence of a vulnerability's existence, you're welcome to submit it in accordance with C4's [submission guidelines](https://docs.code4rena.com/roles/wardens/submission-guidelines). Judges will review submissions and sponsor input to come to their own independent conclusion in alignment with our criteria. Doing this ensures the impartiality of the process. You can read more about our approach to this [here](https://docs.code4rena.com/awarding/judging-criteria).
 
 ### Is the judging criteria set in stone, or does it change?