Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

QA Report #126

Closed
howlbot-integration bot opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

QA Report #126

howlbot-integration bot opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
3 (High Risk) Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly bug Something isn't working duplicate-118 partial-25 Incomplete articulation of vulnerability; eligible for partial credit only (25%) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity") sufficient quality report This report is of sufficient quality upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge

Comments

@howlbot-integration
Copy link

howlbot-integration bot commented Oct 28, 2024 •
edited
Loading

See the markdown file with the details of this report here.
@howlbot-integration howlbot-integration bot added bug Something isn't working QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax sufficient quality report This report is of sufficient quality labels Oct 28, 2024
howlbot-integration bot added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 28, 2024
@howlbot-integration
superpozycja data for issue #126
670e965
howlbot-integration bot added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 28, 2024
@howlbot-integration
superpozycja issue #126
bc58d61
This was referenced Oct 31, 2024
Closed
Open
@ClementWalter
Copy link

Severity: High

Comment: Dup of 118 and 39

@ClementWalter ClementWalter added the sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity") label Nov 4, 2024
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

c4-judge commented Nov 8, 2024

dmvt changed the severity to 3 (High Risk)

1 similar comment
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

c4-judge commented Nov 8, 2024

dmvt changed the severity to 3 (High Risk)

@c4-judge c4-judge added 3 (High Risk) Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge and removed QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax labels Nov 8, 2024
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

c4-judge commented Nov 8, 2024

dmvt marked the issue as duplicate of #118

@c4-judge c4-judge closed this as completed Nov 8, 2024
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

c4-judge commented Nov 8, 2024

dmvt marked the issue as partial-25

@c4-judge c4-judge added the partial-25 Incomplete articulation of vulnerability; eligible for partial credit only (25%) label Nov 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
3 (High Risk) Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly bug Something isn't working duplicate-118 partial-25 Incomplete articulation of vulnerability; eligible for partial credit only (25%) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity") sufficient quality report This report is of sufficient quality upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ClementWalter @c4-judge