From cb87c50f07d882460eaf3361f8d3f38c239e8a9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Spicer Matthews Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2023 15:15:11 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fixed blog typo --- ...ning-code-reviews-maximize-efficiency-and-effectiveness.html | 2 +- .../index.html | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/blog/streamlining-code-reviews-maximize-efficiency-and-effectiveness.html b/content/blog/streamlining-code-reviews-maximize-efficiency-and-effectiveness.html index 1fc7380..506bd04 100644 --- a/content/blog/streamlining-code-reviews-maximize-efficiency-and-effectiveness.html +++ b/content/blog/streamlining-code-reviews-maximize-efficiency-and-effectiveness.html @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@

- While shipping broken code is never ideal, thorough reviews can help prevent it. However, I believe that a robust QA workflow is more crucial than strict code reviews. I've seen + While shipping broken code is never ideal, and thorough reviews can help prevent it. I believe that a robust QA workflow is more crucial than strict code reviews. I've seen numerous development shops undermine the QA process, assuming that the pull request and code review process is sufficient.

diff --git a/docs/blog/streamlining-code-reviews-maximize-efficiency-and-effectiveness/index.html b/docs/blog/streamlining-code-reviews-maximize-efficiency-and-effectiveness/index.html index 1e24fb2..b5f3bcf 100644 --- a/docs/blog/streamlining-code-reviews-maximize-efficiency-and-effectiveness/index.html +++ b/docs/blog/streamlining-code-reviews-maximize-efficiency-and-effectiveness/index.html @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@

Streamlining Code Reviews: Maximize Efficiency and Effec

- While shipping broken code is never ideal, thorough reviews can help prevent it. However, I believe that a robust QA workflow is more crucial than strict code reviews. I've seen + While shipping broken code is never ideal, and thorough reviews can help prevent it. I believe that a robust QA workflow is more crucial than strict code reviews. I've seen numerous development shops undermine the QA process, assuming that the pull request and code review process is sufficient.