Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature request] Add support for Aztec Code #365

Closed
dmlemos opened this issue Mar 24, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

[Feature request] Add support for Aztec Code #365

dmlemos opened this issue Mar 24, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@dmlemos
Copy link

dmlemos commented Mar 24, 2020

I am from the UK. Tesco cards have started to use this type. Would be great if support could be added.

Much prefer using this app than other non open-source apps.

Alternatively #366

@TheLastProject
Copy link
Contributor

AZTEC should be supported:

public static final Collection<String> SUPPORTED_BARCODE_TYPES = Collections.unmodifiableList(
Arrays.asList(
BarcodeFormat.AZTEC.name(),
BarcodeFormat.CODE_39.name(),
BarcodeFormat.CODE_128.name(),
BarcodeFormat.CODABAR.name(),
BarcodeFormat.DATA_MATRIX.name(),
BarcodeFormat.EAN_8.name(),
BarcodeFormat.EAN_13.name(),
BarcodeFormat.ITF.name(),
BarcodeFormat.PDF_417.name(),
BarcodeFormat.QR_CODE.name(),
BarcodeFormat.UPC_A.name()
));

Are you sure you don't just have issues scanning the card due to bad light conditions or shadow over the code or something like that?

@dmlemos
Copy link
Author

dmlemos commented Mar 24, 2020

@TheLastProject you're right actually. I scanned the card using another app in the exact same spot.
After moving to another spot it took a bit more time, but it worked. Apologies for wasting your time.

@dmlemos dmlemos closed this as completed Mar 24, 2020
@TheLastProject
Copy link
Contributor

TheLastProject commented Mar 24, 2020

Not a waste of time, maybe someone else will see this issue and save some time :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants