You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This change would allow for remote blob storage to be directly used for Model storage and Bento storage. fsspec has backends/implementations for S3, GCS, Azure Blob, Databricks Filesystem, FTP, etc.
This can only be a good thing! Additionally, integrating with universal-pathlib might be a good idea.
Is this a move that would be accepted as a Pull Request?
Motivation
We'd like to be able to package Bentos and Models in CI but currently since BentoML only writes to the local filesystem this is not easily possible. Our workaround is to just not store the Bentos or the Models!
Other
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feature request
This change would allow for remote blob storage to be directly used for Model storage and Bento storage.
fsspec
has backends/implementations for S3, GCS, Azure Blob, Databricks Filesystem, FTP, etc.This can only be a good thing! Additionally, integrating with
universal-pathlib
might be a good idea.fsspec
universal-pathlib
Is this a move that would be accepted as a Pull Request?
Motivation
We'd like to be able to package Bentos and Models in CI but currently since BentoML only writes to the local filesystem this is not easily possible. Our workaround is to just not store the Bentos or the Models!
Other
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: