Replies: 3 comments 5 replies
-
@sbrueseke |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
you can get the health check result by cmk
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
It looks like we do get this kind of alert everytime a VR is starting. We run 4.19.1.2 at the moment. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I this this kind of alerts from time to time in our UI Alerts:
Health checks failed: 1 failing checks on router r-555-VM / 9d2d3c6c-d1a7-4fd0-8143-7a94b7032eb6
In management.log I find:
2025-01-22 17:41:24,521 WARN [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-ee7be78a) (logid:4a205737) Health checks failed: 1 failing checks on router r-555-VM / 9d2d3c6c-d1a7-4fd0-8143-7a94b7032eb6. Checking failed health checks to see if router needs recreate
In diagnostic cloud.log I am able to see this:
2025-01-22 17:50:39,837 ERROR Not able to setup source-nat for a regular router yet
This router was started at 2025-01-22 17:39:11
2025-01-22 17:39:11,339 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-81:ctx-48ac6c20 job-20526/job-20527 ctx-8fd308b0) (logid:bde48037) VM instance {"id":555,"instanceName":"r-555-VM","type":"DomainRouter","uuid":"9d2d3c6c-d1a7-4fd0-8143-7a94b7032eb6"} state transited from [Starting] to [Running] with event [OperationSucceeded]. VM's original host: Host {"id":21,"name":"pc-kvm-8","type":"Routing","uuid":"2fbe41ca-73c9-43d4-a16a-1a44be2b1bd2"}, new host: Host {"id":21,"name":"pc-kvm-8","type":"Routing","uuid":"2fbe41ca-73c9-43d4-a16a-1a44be2b1bd2"}, host before state transition: Host {"id":21,"name":"pc-kvm-8","type":"Routing","uuid":"2fbe41ca-73c9-43d4-a16a-1a44be2b1bd2"}
And it looks like the router is working fine. Is this kind of alert expected short after a start or should we investigate this?
Regards,
Swen
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions