-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
simple_demo.launch: "ERROR: Wrong path to settings" #28
Comments
I was able to resolve the libGL warnings, but the "ERROR: Wrong path to settings" and "process has died" errors persist...
|
Hello, have you solved this problem yet? |
i have exactly the same issue, did you find any solutions ? |
Hey @chironrong and @aimiliosnrobotics. @chironrong, sorry for the slow response - was on vacation. Unfortunately I never was able to figure out the problem. However, it is nice to know that I am not alone. Perhaps together we will be able to figure something out. This is some motivation for me to try revisiting this, but for now I am busy with other stuff. Please let me know if you guys find any more clues or have any thoughts or theories about this, and of course if @ZJU-Robotics-Lab has any ideas, please chime in. In the meantime I have had better success with leggedrobotics/elevation_mapping_cupy, so I can recommend that. |
I am attempting to run
simple_demo.launch
as described in the README, but it fails with:Since the example is meant to serve as documentation of how to get GEM working with my robot, not being able to get it running blocks me from using GEM at all.
I am using the following
Dockerfile
which I wrote (the base image requires the NVIDIA Container Toolkit and its tag should be adjusted based on your host CUDA version:... and I made the following shell script to attempt to run the
simple_demo.launch
, which assumes that:test.bag
exists in the current working directory.The full output of the final
docker exec
command is:I don't think the libGL errors are related.
rviz
still works despite them and does show the trajectory, but not the elevation map, of course.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: