You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now I use umo and vmo (mass transport in kg/s IIRC). Sometimes CMIP output only include uo and vo (velocities in m/s). It would be good to be able to deal with these too.
I think this just needs a conversion to mass transport using seawater density and cell face areas?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Visual tests show it's not working. I need to "regrid" the B-grid uo,vo to the C-grid u,v positions to match the C-grid umo/vmo positions of the tests.
Partial solution in 05f604c for ACCESS at least (uo/vo on B-grid vs umo/vmo on C-grid). There is still some difference, but I'm unsure how to deal with it. Maybe it has to do with the orientation where instead of the area derived from the cell thickness I should instead use the upstream cell thickness, or use the mean or the minimum of both directions, or maybe it's non-rectangular vertical face shapes, or density? The right way to check would be to dive into the MOM code... 😨
Right now I use
umo
andvmo
(mass transport in kg/s IIRC). Sometimes CMIP output only includeuo
andvo
(velocities in m/s). It would be good to be able to deal with these too.I think this just needs a conversion to mass transport using seawater density and cell face areas?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: