You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It looks like there is no direct way to get a nice noise summary out of ngspice (and Xyce probably the same). As this is a much used function (sort the noise contributions top to bottom): Would you be interested in building this functionality into xschem?
As an alternative, the simulators could offer this as well, but having it directly as a functionality in xschem has the advantage of being tool agnostic. As long as the noise results are in the .raw file this would work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes I can do that. I am not a very good noise analysis expert, but if data is written in a raw file (real or complex) it can be extracted, processed, printed or plotted. Below an example.
So if you can direct me to a list of parameters that are nice to have that would be helpful.
The other question is if noise contributions are correctly described in the PDK devices.
Of course I assume they are.
It looks like there is no direct way to get a nice noise summary out of ngspice (and Xyce probably the same). As this is a much used function (sort the noise contributions top to bottom): Would you be interested in building this functionality into xschem?
As an alternative, the simulators could offer this as well, but having it directly as a functionality in xschem has the advantage of being tool agnostic. As long as the noise results are in the
.raw
file this would work.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: