Enhance traversal docs #1375
Open
Enhance traversal docs #1375
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for submitting this! I will try to review it when I can, but again this is a welcome contribution. |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 13047597904Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes #1361.
It add some elaboration to the traversal BFS and DFS functions, mainly with a more concrete pseudo-code.
I also fixed small doc errors in betweenness function's docstrings.
In the issue I also suggested doing a face-lift to the dijkstra_search. I can add this in to this PR in the style of the other docstrings changes I'm proposing If you'd like.
nox -e docsandcargo docto see that the result is good.