You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I can't remember whether this was mentioned in the latest Podcasting 2.0, or if it was in Adam's appearance on Buzzcast, but I think it's worth discussing.
What do you think of replicating all the features of the iTunes namespace?
The point for this would be to let app-developers support only a single namespace that has all the features, but then fallback to the iTunes tags if the matching Podcast tags aren't present.
<itunes:episode> would have an equivalent <podcast:episode> for the episode number. Similarly, <itunes:title> would have <podcast:title> for a podcast-app-specific title.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, that's definitely the long-term goal. I think we talked about it Friday on the show. That's where I'd like this thing to end up. Just down the road a ways after we fry bigger fish.
I can't remember whether this was mentioned in the latest Podcasting 2.0, or if it was in Adam's appearance on Buzzcast, but I think it's worth discussing.
What do you think of replicating all the features of the iTunes namespace?
The point for this would be to let app-developers support only a single namespace that has all the features, but then fallback to the iTunes tags if the matching Podcast tags aren't present.
<itunes:episode>
would have an equivalent<podcast:episode>
for the episode number. Similarly,<itunes:title>
would have<podcast:title>
for a podcast-app-specific title.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: