diff --git a/db-backup/riskprofiler_db.sql b/db-backup/riskprofiler_db.sql index e5bfdbef..5441f4de 100644 --- a/db-backup/riskprofiler_db.sql +++ b/db-backup/riskprofiler_db.sql @@ -75741,7 +75741,7 @@ INSERT INTO `wp_postmeta` (`meta_id`, `post_id`, `meta_key`, `meta_value`) VALUE (71602, 41, '_elements_3_block_id', 'builder_layout_block_content_blockid'), (71603, 41, 'elements_3_classes', ''), (71604, 41, '_elements_3_classes', 'builder_layout_block_content_css'), -(71605, 41, 'elements_3_blocks_0_body', 'All data on RiskProfiler is available for download under the Open Government Licence - Canada\r\n\r\nAdditional Documentation provides technical documentation associated with the information presented on RiskProfiler. \r\n

Earthquake Scenario Data

\r\nThe National Earthquake Scenario Catalogue presents the probable shaking, damage loss and consequences, such as potential building damages and injuries, from hypothetical earthquakes that could impact Canadians. Earthquake scenario data is available through the Open Disaster Risk Reduction (OpenDRR) website here. More information about earthquake scenario risk concepts can be found here and more information about how the data was generated can be found here\r\n

Probabilistic Earthquake Risk Data

\r\nProbabilistic earthquake risk data presents consequences, including economic loss, casualties and building damages, that could be expected from earthquakes at all neighborhoods in Canada. Probabilistic earthquake risk data is available through the Open Disaster Risk Reduction (OpenDRR) website here. More information about probabilistic earthquake risk concepts can be found here and more information about how the data was generated can be found here\r\n

Other Downloads

\r\nThe Additional Documentation page provides links to technical documentation associated with information presented on RiskProfiler. \r\n\r\nProbabilistic Earthquake Risk Assessment Data Dictionary \r\n\r\nEarthquake Scenario Risk Assessment Data Dictionary \r\n\r\nNational Human Settlement Layer (NHSL)\r\n'), +(71605, 41, 'elements_3_blocks_0_body', 'All data on RiskProfiler is available for download under the Open Government Licence - Canada\r\n\r\nAdditional Documentation provides technical documentation associated with the information presented on RiskProfiler. \r\n

Earthquake Scenario Data

\r\nThe National Earthquake Scenario Catalogue presents the probable shaking, damage loss and consequences, such as potential building damages and injuries, from hypothetical earthquakes that could impact Canadians. Earthquake scenario data is available through the Open Disaster Risk Reduction (OpenDRR) website here. More information about earthquake scenario risk concepts can be found here and more information about how the data was generated can be found here\r\n

Probabilistic Earthquake Risk Data

\r\nProbabilistic earthquake risk data presents consequences, including economic loss, casualties and building damages, that could be expected from earthquakes at all neighborhoods in Canada. Probabilistic earthquake risk data is available through the Open Disaster Risk Reduction (OpenDRR) website here. More information about probabilistic earthquake risk concepts can be found here and more information about how the data was generated can be found here\r\n

Other Downloads

\r\nThe Additional Documentation page provides links to technical documentation associated with information presented on RiskProfiler. \r\n\r\nProbabilistic Earthquake Risk Assessment Data Dictionary \r\n\r\nEarthquake Scenario Risk Assessment Data Dictionary \r\n\r\nNational Human Settlement Layer (NHSL)\r\n'), (71606, 41, '_elements_3_blocks_0_body', 'builder_block_content_text_clone_builder_block_content_text_body'), (71607, 41, 'elements_3_blocks', 'a:1:{i:0;s:4:\"text\";}'), (71608, 41, '_elements_3_blocks', 'builder_layout_block_content_clone_field_5dbc5d79be45e'), @@ -175049,7 +175049,7 @@ INSERT INTO `wp_postmeta` (`meta_id`, `post_id`, `meta_key`, `meta_value`) VALUE (178028, 914, '_elements_1_block_id', 'builder_layout_block_content_blockid'), (178029, 914, 'elements_1_classes', ''), (178030, 914, '_elements_1_classes', 'builder_layout_block_content_css'), -(178031, 914, 'elements_1_blocks_0_body', 'The information presented on RiskProfiler is intended to inform community decision-making, with consideration of its limitations. See the Disclaimer for details and legal restrictions. \r\n\r\nRiskProfiler is intended to provide information for decision-making and should be used alongside community validation and engagement. Community context should be incorporated into all decision-making and used to validate this statistical assessment. \r\n\r\nKey considerations for understanding the modelling results include the following. They are further explored in the FAQs and other documentation\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nRiskProfiler provides estimates about the potential impacts from earthquakes. The results are likely an underestimation as they only account for direct damage to buildings and inhabitants. Potential indirect damages such as business interruptions and damages to critical infrastructure, utilities, vehicles or high consequence facilities such as dams are not included. Impacts from secondary hazards such as earthquake aftershocks, liquefaction, landslides, or fire following are also not included.\r\n\r\nThe information is based on national-scale models of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, and are intended to represent typical conditions in any given area, but may not precisely represent local conditions. Results should not be used for site-specific applications.\r\n\r\nThese scenarios are HYPOTHETICAL, but represent credible events which may occur. This suite of scenarios is based primarily on historical earthquakes, known faults, and/or background seismicity levels consistent with Canada’s National Seismic Hazard Model. It is by no means an exhaustive list of all potential scenarios that are possible.\r\n\r\nThis modelling approach uses state-of-the-art techniques and data, but is subject to significant sources of uncertainty inherent in any seismic risk model. Therefore, scenarios should be regarded as estimates, representing the average result of thousands of realizations of model parameters. Furthermore, the exposure model used herein is a representative inventory rather than a true database of the built environment. Results are not to be used for any building- or site-specific application, or any other domain which would require oversight by an accredited professional. The results may be used in aggregate for estimating the likely impacts of certain representative earthquake scenarios on a region of interest such as a municipality or regional district. For any questions on the appropriate use of these data, please contact our team.'), +(178031, 914, 'elements_1_blocks_0_body', 'The information presented on RiskProfiler is intended to inform community decision-making, with consideration of its limitations. See the Disclaimer for details and legal restrictions. \r\n\r\nRiskProfiler is intended to provide information for decision-making and should be used alongside community validation and engagement. Community context should be incorporated into all decision-making and used to validate this statistical assessment. \r\n\r\nKey considerations for understanding the modelling results include the following. They are further explored in the FAQ and other documentation\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nRiskProfiler provides estimates about the potential impacts from earthquakes. The results are likely an underestimation as they only account for direct damage to buildings and inhabitants. Potential indirect damages such as business interruptions and damages to critical infrastructure, utilities, vehicles or high consequence facilities such as dams are not included. Impacts from secondary hazards such as earthquake aftershocks, liquefaction, landslides, or fire following are also not included.\r\n\r\nThe information is based on national-scale models of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, and are intended to represent typical conditions in any given area, but may not precisely represent local conditions. Results should not be used for site-specific applications.\r\n\r\nThese scenarios are HYPOTHETICAL, but represent credible events which may occur. This suite of scenarios is based primarily on historical earthquakes, known faults, and/or background seismicity levels consistent with Canada’s National Seismic Hazard Model. It is by no means an exhaustive list of all potential scenarios that are possible.\r\n\r\nThis modelling approach uses state-of-the-art techniques and data, but is subject to significant sources of uncertainty inherent in any seismic risk model. Therefore, scenarios should be regarded as estimates, representing the average result of thousands of realizations of model parameters. Furthermore, the exposure model used herein is a representative inventory rather than a true database of the built environment. Results are not to be used for any building- or site-specific application, or any other domain which would require oversight by an accredited professional. The results may be used in aggregate for estimating the likely impacts of certain representative earthquake scenarios on a region of interest such as a municipality or regional district. For any questions on the appropriate use of these data, please contact our team.'), (178032, 914, '_elements_1_blocks_0_body', 'builder_block_content_text_clone_builder_block_content_text_body'), (178033, 914, 'elements_1_blocks', 'a:1:{i:0;s:4:\"text\";}'), (178034, 914, '_elements_1_blocks', 'builder_layout_block_content_clone_field_5dbc5d79be45e'), @@ -175605,7 +175605,7 @@ INSERT INTO `wp_postmeta` (`meta_id`, `post_id`, `meta_key`, `meta_value`) VALUE (178583, 916, '_elements_1_block_id', 'builder_layout_block_content_blockid'), (178584, 916, 'elements_1_classes', ''), (178585, 916, '_elements_1_classes', 'builder_layout_block_content_css'), -(178586, 916, 'elements_1_blocks_0_body', 'As we cannot yet predict an earthquake event, scenarios are developed to represent potential damage and losses from possible earthquakes. Scenarios are a tool to understand the impact of an earthquake on a community and provide information for planning and preparation. \r\n\r\nAn earthquake scenario has a specific magnitude, location, and source fault. Scenarios are developed for known faults, historical earthquakes, or regions where we know earthquakes can happen. The scenarios in RiskProfiler have been identified by NRCan analysts based on our best understanding of earthquake science, but there are many other earthquakes that could occur and these are not necessarily the largest or most damaging possible events. The scenario catalogue is a living database that will be updated as new information and planning needs are identified. You can find more information about the earthquake scenario catalogue here.\r\n\r\n\"Map\r\n

How does RiskProfiler assess impacts of an earthquake scenario?

\r\nThe impacts of an earthquake scenario are modelled by predicting the potential earthquake ground shaking for the scenario, the associated damage to buildings, and consequences as a result of building damage such as human casualties or financial losses. In general, places with more ground shaking, denser development, and fragile buildings (e.g. those made of brick as opposed to reinforced concrete) are more impacted than regions without. A detailed description of how NRCan estimates the impacts associated from earthquake scenarios can be found here. The uncertainties and intended uses of this information can be found here\r\n

What earthquake scenario information is available on RiskProfiler, and how does it help?

\r\nRiskProfiler provides the number of injuries and fatalities, direct economic cost, and number of buildings at each damage level within the earthquake impact area. RiskProfiler also provides information about the secondary consequence of how much debris may be generated from damaged buildings. For each area, you can explore how these estimates change by factors such as occupancy type, construction type, or seismic-design level. For example, it is generally true that there are more negative impacts from older pre-code buildings — buildings which were constructed prior to the acceptance of a stringent building code in Canada.\r\n\r\nEarthquake information is available at the scale of ‘settled areas’, which show areas of building development at the scale of roughly a neighbourhood. See more information in the FAQs.\r\n\r\nInformation given for earthquake scenarios on RiskProfiler can help you answer questions like:\r\n\r\nRiskProfiler also provides the same outputs assuming the entire building stock is seismically retrofitted. This can help answer questions such as: what is the total potential reduction in impacts if every applicable building in the current stock was retrofitted? When the results with the retrofit toggle are broken down by building type, then you can answer questions like: what building types should be retrofitted to achieve the largest reduction in impacts?'), +(178586, 916, 'elements_1_blocks_0_body', 'As we cannot yet predict an earthquake event, scenarios are developed to represent potential damage and losses from possible earthquakes. Scenarios are a tool to understand the impact of an earthquake on a community and provide information for planning and preparation. \r\n\r\nAn earthquake scenario has a specific magnitude, location, and source fault. Scenarios are developed for known faults, historical earthquakes, or regions where we know earthquakes can happen. The scenarios in RiskProfiler have been identified by NRCan analysts based on our best understanding of earthquake science, but there are many other earthquakes that could occur and these are not necessarily the largest or most damaging possible events. The scenario catalogue is a living database that will be updated as new information and planning needs are identified. You can find more information about the earthquake scenario catalogue here.\r\n\r\n\"Map\r\n

How does RiskProfiler assess impacts of an earthquake scenario?

\r\nThe impacts of an earthquake scenario are modelled by predicting the potential earthquake ground shaking for the scenario, the associated damage to buildings, and consequences as a result of building damage such as human casualties or financial losses. In general, places with more ground shaking, denser development, and fragile buildings (e.g. those made of brick as opposed to reinforced concrete) are more impacted than regions without. A detailed description of how NRCan estimates the impacts associated from earthquake scenarios can be found here. The uncertainties and intended uses of this information can be found here\r\n

What earthquake scenario information is available on RiskProfiler and how does it help?

\r\nRiskProfiler provides the number of injuries and fatalities, direct economic cost, and number of buildings at each damage level within the earthquake impact area. RiskProfiler also provides information about the secondary consequence of how much debris may be generated from damaged buildings. For each area, you can explore how these estimates change by factors such as occupancy type, construction type, or seismic-design level. For example, it is generally true that there are more negative impacts from older pre-code buildings — buildings which were constructed prior to the acceptance of a stringent building code in Canada.\r\n\r\nEarthquake information is available at the scale of ‘settled areas’, which show areas of building development at the scale of roughly a neighbourhood. See more information in the FAQ.\r\n\r\nInformation given for earthquake scenarios on RiskProfiler can help you answer questions like:\r\n\r\nRiskProfiler also provides the same outputs assuming the entire building stock is seismically retrofitted. This can help answer questions such as: what is the total potential reduction in impacts if every applicable building in the current stock was retrofitted? When the results with the retrofit toggle are broken down by building type, then you can answer questions like: what building types should be retrofitted to achieve the largest reduction in impacts?'), (178587, 916, '_elements_1_blocks_0_body', 'builder_block_content_text_clone_builder_block_content_text_body'), (178588, 916, 'elements_1_blocks', 'a:1:{i:0;s:4:\"text\";}'), (178589, 916, '_elements_1_blocks', 'builder_layout_block_content_clone_field_5dbc5d79be45e'), @@ -180883,7 +180883,7 @@ INSERT INTO `wp_postmeta` (`meta_id`, `post_id`, `meta_key`, `meta_value`) VALUE (184500, 1003, '_elements_1_block_id', 'builder_layout_block_content_blockid'), (184501, 1003, 'elements_1_classes', ''), (184502, 1003, '_elements_1_classes', 'builder_layout_block_content_css'), -(184503, 1003, 'elements_1_blocks_0_body', 'Earthquakes are a risk to people and infrastructure in Canada. While damaging earthquakes don’t happen often, the impacts will be significant when one inevitably occurs, especially if it is centered near a densely populated area. Strong ground shaking from earthquakes can impact many things we care about and rely on. It can injure people, disrupt businesses, damage infrastructure, destabilize and liquify ground, trigger a tsunami, or spark fires in damaged buildings. If communities aren’t prepared for the impacts that could occur, they may not have the capacity to withstand and recover. Earthquake scenarios help understand the potential impacts of earthquakes and prepare for them.\r\n\r\nAn earthquake is an episode of ground shaking that happens when there is a sudden stress release in the earth’s crust. Earthquakes happen along faults - places where blocks of the earth’s crust move against each other. Seismologists and earth scientists at Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) examine earthquake activity and evidence of past earthquakes in geologic and historical records to identify areas where earthquakes might happen in Canada. You can learn more about NRCan’s work and understanding of earthquake hazards in Canada here and more general information from Public Safety Canada here\r\n\r\nMany Indigenous people’s oral traditions and histories tell of earthquakes and tsunamis and their impacts. A map of earthquakes which have been recorded through seismographs or estimated between 1627 to 2020 is shown below. \r\n\r\nEarthquake risk can be understood by examining the impact of specific scenarios as well as considering the likelihood of damage through a probabilistic approach. RiskProfiler provides seismic risk estimates for both specific earthquake scenarios as well as over annual or 50 year (return) periods from a probabilistic estimate of all possible earthquakes. \r\n

What is risk?

\r\nRisk results from a combination of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. The figure below is a depiction of risk. \r\n\r\n\"Hazard,\r\n\r\nHazard is the anticipated level of ground shaking from earthquakes. Hazard varies from place to place, and is generally higher in zones that are seismically active such as the west coast, Yukon, and St Lawrence river areas as shown on the map below. \r\n\r\n\"2015\r\n\r\nExposure is the assets that may be affected by the shaking. In RiskProfiler the exposure of buildings, building contents, and people to earthquakes are estimated. Vulnerability describes the potential to suffer some level of damage or loss depending on the severity of the earthquake ground shaking. It is based on attributes such as building construction, seismic resilience or social vulnerability. \r\n\r\nWhen you combine our understanding of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, you get risk. Two identical communities with the same hazard might have very different risks if one community has buildings that can be more easily damaged by shaking. For example, historical brick buildings tend to be more easily damaged by earthquakes relative to wooden buildings. Although we cannot change our underlying hazard, we can develop strategies to reduce the potential exposure and vulnerability to manage the risk. Information provided on RiskProfiler is designed to help users work towards this goal. \r\n\r\nSome risk models may also consider capacity and additional impacts such as disruption, infrastructure damage, displacement, and subsequent hazards, however, those are not considered in RiskProfiler at this point. See the FAQs for more information on the risk estimates and the Learn More section on Uncertainties and Intended Use'), +(184503, 1003, 'elements_1_blocks_0_body', 'Earthquakes are a risk to people and infrastructure in Canada. While damaging earthquakes don’t happen often, the impacts will be significant when one inevitably occurs, especially if it is centered near a densely populated area. Strong ground shaking from earthquakes can impact many things we care about and rely on. It can injure people, disrupt businesses, damage infrastructure, destabilize and liquify ground, trigger a tsunami, or spark fires in damaged buildings. If communities aren’t prepared for the impacts that could occur, they may not have the capacity to withstand and recover. Earthquake scenarios help understand the potential impacts of earthquakes and prepare for them.\r\n\r\nAn earthquake is an episode of ground shaking that happens when there is a sudden stress release in the earth’s crust. Earthquakes happen along faults - places where blocks of the earth’s crust move against each other. Seismologists and earth scientists at Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) examine earthquake activity and evidence of past earthquakes in geologic and historical records to identify areas where earthquakes might happen in Canada. You can learn more about NRCan’s work and understanding of earthquake hazards in Canada here and more general information from Public Safety Canada here\r\n\r\nMany Indigenous peoples’ oral traditions and histories tell of earthquakes and tsunamis and their impacts. A map of earthquakes which have been recorded through seismographs or estimated between 1627 to 2020 is shown below. \r\n\r\nEarthquake risk can be understood by examining the impact of specific scenarios as well as considering the likelihood of damage through a probabilistic approach. RiskProfiler provides seismic risk estimates for both specific earthquake scenarios as well as over annual or 50 year (return) periods from a probabilistic estimate of all possible earthquakes. \r\n

What is risk?

\r\nRisk results from a combination of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. The figure below is a depiction of risk. \r\n\r\n\"Hazard,\r\n\r\nHazard is the anticipated level of ground shaking from earthquakes. Hazard varies from place to place, and is generally higher in zones that are seismically active such as the west coast, Yukon, and St Lawrence river areas as shown on the map below. \r\n\r\n\"2015\r\n\r\nExposure is the assets that may be affected by the shaking. In RiskProfiler the exposure of buildings, building contents, and people to earthquakes are estimated. Vulnerability describes the potential to suffer some level of damage or loss depending on the severity of the earthquake ground shaking. It is based on attributes such as building construction, seismic resilience or social vulnerability. \r\n\r\nWhen you combine our understanding of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, you get risk. Two identical communities with the same hazard might have very different risks if one community has buildings that can be more easily damaged by shaking. For example, historical brick buildings tend to be more easily damaged by earthquakes relative to wooden buildings. Although we cannot change our underlying hazard, we can develop strategies to reduce the potential exposure and vulnerability to manage the risk. Information provided on RiskProfiler is designed to help users work towards this goal. \r\n\r\nSome risk models may also consider capacity and additional impacts such as disruption, infrastructure damage, displacement, and subsequent hazards, however, those are not considered in RiskProfiler at this point. See the FAQ for more information on the risk estimates and the Learn More section on Uncertainties and Intended Use'), (184504, 1003, '_elements_1_blocks_0_body', 'builder_block_content_text_clone_builder_block_content_text_body'), (184505, 1003, 'elements_1_blocks', 'a:1:{i:0;s:4:\"text\";}'), (184506, 1003, '_elements_1_blocks', 'builder_layout_block_content_clone_field_5dbc5d79be45e'), @@ -187785,7 +187785,7 @@ INSERT INTO `wp_postmeta` (`meta_id`, `post_id`, `meta_key`, `meta_value`) VALUE (191403, 1036, '_elements_5_blocks_0_containers', 'builder_block_content_query_clone_builder_block_content_query_containers'), (191404, 922, 'learnmore_title', 'Read Frequently Asked Questions'), (191405, 922, '_learnmore_title', 'field_6346ba57ca8de'), -(191406, 922, 'learnmore_excerpt', 'Understand the data through ‘FAQs’.'), +(191406, 922, 'learnmore_excerpt', 'Understand the data through FAQ.'), (191407, 922, '_learnmore_excerpt', 'field_6346ba5fca8df'), (191408, 1037, 'hero_title', 'Frequently Asked Questions'), (191409, 1037, '_hero_title', 'field_6241ad1e84abc'),