You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Similar issue for resources like Drugbank - the metadata on https://github.com/Knowledge-Graph-Hub/kg-registry/blob/main/resource/drugbank.md all refers to the obo-db-ingest version of this resource, which is fine if you're already familiar with Drugbank, but otherwise confusing.
The top-level metadata for a resource should be about that resource (in this case, Drugbank) while the products should contain metadata about their own provenance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Some resource pages currently define products that have the same source, just in different serializations, etc.
e.g., there's a page for Biolink itself: https://github.com/Knowledge-Graph-Hub/kg-registry/blob/main/resource/biolink.md
but the page for Automat (https://github.com/Knowledge-Graph-Hub/kg-registry/blob/main/resource/automat.md) defines
biolink_automat
as one of its products.In my view,
biolink_automat
should be listed on the Biolink page, with a value (at least a tag) indicating its source is Automat.Similar issue for resources like Drugbank - the metadata on https://github.com/Knowledge-Graph-Hub/kg-registry/blob/main/resource/drugbank.md all refers to the
obo-db-ingest
version of this resource, which is fine if you're already familiar with Drugbank, but otherwise confusing.The top-level metadata for a resource should be about that resource (in this case, Drugbank) while the products should contain metadata about their own provenance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: