You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When working with multiple subjects with each multiple combinations of subject-related settings, it is difficult to share these combinations of settings with other researchers.
Describe the solution you'd like
The new feature should enable researchers to more easily share settings between each other.
After a discussion with the contributors of this repo, we came up with the idea to have a settings file per subject in which using switch case statements you can create your multiple combinations of settings. A first draft of this is proposed in ee6cbb4.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Having one settings file with an additional layer of switch case statement for the 'subjects'
Having a settings file for each combination of settings
Additional context
This seems to be somewhat related to #49, i.e. more easily interpret which settings were used to run a certain simulation.
Are you willing to contribute in the development of this feature?
Yes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When working with multiple subjects with each multiple combinations of subject-related settings, it is difficult to share these combinations of settings with other researchers.
Describe the solution you'd like
The new feature should enable researchers to more easily share settings between each other.
After a discussion with the contributors of this repo, we came up with the idea to have a settings file per subject in which using switch case statements you can create your multiple combinations of settings. A first draft of this is proposed in ee6cbb4.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
This seems to be somewhat related to #49, i.e. more easily interpret which settings were used to run a certain simulation.
Are you willing to contribute in the development of this feature?
Yes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: