Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump to Jump 1.3 #176

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Bump to Jump 1.3 #176

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tmigot
Copy link
Member

@tmigot tmigot commented Mar 26, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.50%. Comparing base (8dd876f) to head (1d97306).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #176      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.20%   93.50%   +0.30%     
==========================================
  Files           5        5              
  Lines         662      662              
==========================================
+ Hits          617      619       +2     
+ Misses         45       43       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

Package name latest stable
NLSProblems.jl
OptimizationProblems.jl

@blegat
Copy link
Contributor

blegat commented Mar 26, 2024

Not sure it's needed. Unless I am mistaken, it will only need a bump at v2, see https://pkgdocs.julialang.org/v1/compatibility/#Version-specifier-format

@tmigot
Copy link
Member Author

tmigot commented Mar 26, 2024

Yes, you are right, I just noticed that. Thanks @blegat

@tmigot tmigot closed this Mar 26, 2024
@tmigot tmigot deleted the bump-jump branch March 26, 2024 20:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants