Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add documentation for evals_set parameter #387

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Priynsh
Copy link

@Priynsh Priynsh commented Dec 26, 2024

Fixes #374 adding documentation for the evals_set parameter which seems to be missing otherwise.

Copy link
Collaborator

@willow-ahrens willow-ahrens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This isn't an accurate description of this parameter: 7d37634#diff-a4121e6af3eac1a9746b039d2ed91c9682bcfc0422ec37b531a0136d32498e39R82

I think a better name for evals_set would be skip_tuning.

If you're up for it, you can file a PR which removes the evals_set parameter, defaults evals to nothing in the Parameters constructor, and uses tune to update the value of evals only when it is set to nothing, then document the new sentinel value of evals.

@Priynsh
Copy link
Author

Priynsh commented Dec 31, 2024

Thanks for the feedback! I have tried to implement the changes. Closing this PR and starting a new one.

@Priynsh Priynsh closed this Dec 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Default parameter option evals_set is not documented
2 participants