We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
你好,请问这篇论文中所提出的模型架构 与Vmunet中所提出的模型架构不同点是什么?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
thats a great question I was reading this artivle by myself too and I had the exact same question if you figure it out please tell me. :))
Sorry, something went wrong.
事实上有两个不同点: 1.在bottle neck 部分(就是编码器最后一层和解码器的第一层),vmunet用的是2个VSS block×2,而SwinUmamba用的是两个VSS block×1,只不过SwinUmamba是把解码器那部分bottle neck编在编码器罢了,很巧妙的trick。 2.SwinUmamba在解码器部分引入了深度监督(也叫中继监督)。一般模型计算损失是用整个模型的最后一层的预测和GT作损失,深度监督就是在模型的中间层也和GT作损失。SwinUmamba的具体做法就是,在解码器的四个层(包括最后一层,就是最终预测)都与GT作损失(GT同时下采样为对应层的形状),然后再把四个层的损失作加权求和。
No branches or pull requests
你好,请问这篇论文中所提出的模型架构


与Vmunet中所提出的模型架构不同点是什么?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: