You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
630 Total Views of Asynchronous Program Presentation within 7 Days (TOTVIEWS)
Current Definition:
The count of views of asynchronous program presentations for a period of seven (7) days after the presentation was posted, even if that period extends beyond the survey reporting period (or fiscal year). For program presentations made available via Facebook, count unique 1-minute views of each video. For those made available via other platforms, count unique views of each video.
For program presentations that are recordings of synchronous virtual program sessions, exclude synchronous attendance; these should be counted under Synchronous In-Person Onsite Program Attendance, Synchronous In-Person Offsite Program Attendance, or Synchronous Virtual Program Attendance (data elements 616, 617, or 618).
Revised Definition:
The count of views of asynchronous program presentations for a period of thirty (30) days after the presentation was posted, even if that period extends beyond the survey reporting period (or fiscal year)...
**Justification **:
Most public libraries I have consulted with about this new element (630) have expressed that the 7-day period for this particular type of metric is too limited and is of little local value. Many libraries track (and report to their local governing bodies) a variety of engagement metrics from social media platforms on a monthly basis. Given that most asynchronous views of library programs occur via social media platforms like Facebook and YouTube, tracking an additional 7-day view metric solely for the purposes of reporting on the PLS creates an additional burden for libraries without adding value to that data locally.
The 7-day tracking period is especially problematic for small public libraries. Many of these libraries -- if they are able to devote any staff time to virtual programs at all -- are only able to create one or two virtual programs each month. A 7-day viewing period seems biased toward larger, urban libraries that are better resourced to create and post new program content on a daily or weekly basis.
Potential methodological issues:
Changing an item's definition so soon after development and addition to PLS.
States already collecting:
Unknown
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Name:
Ross Fuqua
State/Affiliation:
SDC, State Library of Oregon
Description of Change:
Existing Data Element:
Current Definition:
The count of views of asynchronous program presentations for a period of seven (7) days after the presentation was posted, even if that period extends beyond the survey reporting period (or fiscal year). For program presentations made available via Facebook, count unique 1-minute views of each video. For those made available via other platforms, count unique views of each video.
For program presentations that are recordings of synchronous virtual program sessions, exclude synchronous attendance; these should be counted under Synchronous In-Person Onsite Program Attendance, Synchronous In-Person Offsite Program Attendance, or Synchronous Virtual Program Attendance (data elements 616, 617, or 618).
Revised Definition:
The count of views of asynchronous program presentations for a period of thirty (30) days after the presentation was posted, even if that period extends beyond the survey reporting period (or fiscal year)...
**Justification **:
Most public libraries I have consulted with about this new element (630) have expressed that the 7-day period for this particular type of metric is too limited and is of little local value. Many libraries track (and report to their local governing bodies) a variety of engagement metrics from social media platforms on a monthly basis. Given that most asynchronous views of library programs occur via social media platforms like Facebook and YouTube, tracking an additional 7-day view metric solely for the purposes of reporting on the PLS creates an additional burden for libraries without adding value to that data locally.
The 7-day tracking period is especially problematic for small public libraries. Many of these libraries -- if they are able to devote any staff time to virtual programs at all -- are only able to create one or two virtual programs each month. A 7-day viewing period seems biased toward larger, urban libraries that are better resourced to create and post new program content on a daily or weekly basis.
Potential methodological issues:
Changing an item's definition so soon after development and addition to PLS.
States already collecting:
Unknown
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: