You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
app.sketch becomes the master sketch library file. All master symbols, icons, colors, and type treatments would live here.
The idea is that as a change to a global UI component is approved and added to the app.sketch. file. These changes would trickle down to the different screens. Making smaller changes to the app more trackable.
App Screen Breakout
Breaking out the different screens would make me less nervous as each branch and PR wouldn't be replacing the entirety of the design file each time. Allowing for quick iterations on branches that would (hopefully) be more tractable and easier to maintain. What do ya'll think?
Any ideas, to make this better? @rnystrom If you think this would be helpful I think I might work on this next. 👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sounds like fun! I think best practices working with sketch in a git repo is still very new. Maybe after Githawk has a good flow is going we should write a Medium article and help set more public concrete Best practices. 😆
Overview
I have been doing some thinking about Githawk and had an idea for the design repo to talk about if you are all up for it!
I would like to suggest a refactor the design files for Githawk. The goals for this update are;
Proposed Implementation
App Library
app.sketch
becomes the master sketch library file. All master symbols, icons, colors, and type treatments would live here.The idea is that as a change to a global UI component is approved and added to the
app.sketch
. file. These changes would trickle down to the different screens. Making smaller changes to the app more trackable.App Screen Breakout
Breaking out the different screens would make me less nervous as each branch and PR wouldn't be replacing the entirety of the design file each time. Allowing for quick iterations on branches that would (hopefully) be more tractable and easier to maintain. What do ya'll think?
Any ideas, to make this better? @rnystrom If you think this would be helpful I think I might work on this next. 👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: